Rethink word choice when dealing with problem employees

Discipline’s (relatively) easy when a staffer breaks a rule or fails to meet expectations. But what about an employee who gets the job done but has a problem that’s more difficult to identify?

You know, the person who’s labeled by co-workers as having “a bad attitude.”

Anyone in management knows the problems a bad attitude can cause: low morale, decreased productivity, poor communication, etc.

But when confronted by a supervisor, the offenders often have a defense ready: “But I do my job.”

The best way to respond? Stop thinking of it as an attitude problem and address the situation as what it really is: a behavior problem.

Attitude can be tough to put your finger on, but behavior is something you can see, document and measure – and, most importantly, change.

When you hear complaints from a problem employee’s co-workers, get specific examples of what’s been happening.

And instead of simply telling an employee, “I don’t like your attitude,” give him or her specific examples of the kind of behavior that needs to be corrected.

Next step: Make sure the employee knows positive behavior when dealing with co-workers and managers is part of his or her job.

One way to reinforce that point: Include behavior as a standard during performance reviews.

For example, your expectations can include something like “Maintaining positive relationships with

co-workers, users and supervisors.”

Make Smarter Tech Decisions

Get the latest IT news, trends, and insights - delivered weekly.

Privacy Policy

Related Posts

  • Anonymous

    A more productive approach would involve working with the employee to determine what is it that he or she is not getting from the position and facilitating slight modifications that will be mutually beneficial. For example, an employee who is performing well but is touchy might be frustrated by their lack of input or control over aspects of their job where he feels he can bring value. Or a hard and fast 8AM start may be adding problematic where a 8:30-5:30 shift might not. Or the employee may feel that there is no career path and have ambitions that he feels are being blocked. Utilizing the differences between employee and working to inspire (not motivate) them by fostering growth in the job can be more productive than hierarchal confrontation.